We assess their motivation for seeking anonymity. Is there another way to confirm the information? Often our response to the reporter is, keep reporting. I am involved as executive editor on key stories and revelations attributed to anonymous sources. We understand both the risks and the opening it gives to critics of an article how can you trust the information if others can’t verify or know the source?Ī reporter must reveal his or her sources to an editor before we consider publication. We try very hard to abide by our rules, standards and principles surrounding use of such sources. Journalists use anonymous sources, including here at the Deseret News. But you have to balance those concerns with the public’s need to know, two months away from an election.” There are moral complications and ambiguities around granting anonymity to sources. Goldberg, who stands by his reporting, said this about the use of anonymous sources, in an interview that appeared in his magazine following the publication of the article: “It’s not a decision that should be made lightly. The White House refuted the story and said flatly, “It’s false.” It then collected and published on-the-record statements under this headline: “21 Officials, 14 from Paris Trip, Now on Record Refuting Anonymous Sources in False ‘The Atlantic’ story.” Some praised Trump’s actions with the military, his past responses or focused on a key part of The Atlantic piece. Reporters from other news outlets, including Fox News, said they confirmed some parts of the report, also with anonymous sources. Goldberg, who said he’s followed the president’s reaction to the military for years, said four “excellent” sources provided him the information that led to the story. history.ĭuring the past week, the use of anonymous sources has been both attacked and supported following the publication of The Atlantic’s piece by executive editor Jeffrey Goldberg headlined: “Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers.’” With Felt’s permission, the Post confirmed the Vanity Fair account and Woodward penned the long-awaited compelling piece, How Mark Felt Became “Deep Throat,” one of the most consequential anonymous sources in modern U.S. The compelling account traced how Joan and the Vanity Fair writer had come to know that Felt, who was 91 at the time, was the anonymous source that helped guide Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein through the reporting that eventually led to the resignation of President Richard M. But this time was different Felt’s family was involved. Many had put forth theories about the identity of this key unknown Watergate figure. The identity of “Deep Throat” was one of the few remaining mysteries in one of the biggest stories of the century. We snapped to attention because Felt had been living in Santa Rosa with his daughter Joan for 13 years and some of our reporters knew her. Mark Felt, a career FBI man, was “Deep Throat.” Vanity Fair magazine had released a blockbuster story, identifying the key source in the Watergate scandal, a secret successfully kept hidden for more than three decades. SALT LAKE CITY - On a cool evening in June 2005 alerts started coming into the newsroom of the Press Democrat in Santa Rosa, California, where I was working as an editor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |